O impacto das metodologias cascata e Scrum na criação de aplicações utilizando Outsystems

Abstract

The advancement of low-code platforms, such as OutSystems, has transformed software development by reducing technical complexity and accelerating application delivery. In this context, the choice of development methodology plays a decisive role in project productivity and quality. This study provides a comparative analysis of the impacts of the Waterfall and Scrum methodologies in the creation of low-code applications, based on a literature review and market experiences observed between 2015 and 2026. The results indicate that the Waterfall model is more suitable for projects with a closed scope, regulatory environments, and contexts that require rigorous documentation, benefiting predictability and traceability. In contrast, Scrum enhances the low-code paradigm by fostering iterative cycles, incremental deliveries, and greater adaptability to change, thereby reducing rework and increasing customer satisfaction. It is concluded that the choice of methodology in the context of low-code and the OutSystems platform should consider the degree of requirement stability and organizational maturity, with Scrum being more compatible with dynamic scenarios and better supporting mature teams, while Waterfall proves more efficient in controlled and normative environments, facilitating stakeholder separation and serving as a viable option for less experienced teams.