MQTT Over QUIC: Comparison with TCP and TCP+TLS in a Virtualized IoT Environment
| dc.creator | Luna, Davi Souza de | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-05-27T15:52:55Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-05-27T15:52:55Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-05-06 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.ifpe.edu.br/xmlui/handle/123456789/2199 | |
| dc.description.abstract | IoT applications require reliable, efficient, and secure communication due to their distributed and resourceconstrained nature. Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) is widely adopted in these environments for its lightweight design, requiring minimal resources and optimizing network bandwidth. However, it still faces performance issues due to TCP and Transport Layer Security (TLS) overhead. Quick UDP Internet Connections (QUIC) has emerged as a promising alternative to improve communication performance. However, existing performance studies lack evaluations of MQTT over QUIC under low latency and unstable network conditions. This paper compares the performance of MQTT over QUIC, TCP, and TCP+TLS in a virtualized IoT environment. The performance evaluation follows a well-established approach and analyses latency and connection establishment time as key metrics under stable and unstable conditions. Results highlight the potential of QUIC as an efficient and secure alternative for IoT communication. | pt_BR |
| dc.format.extent | 6f. : il. | pt_BR |
| dc.language | en | pt_BR |
| dc.relation | Rana Alharbi and David Aspinall. An iot analysis framework: An investigation of iot smart cameras’ vulnerabilities. In Living in the Internet of Things: Cybersecurity of the IoT - 2018, pages 1–10, March 2018. Andrew Banks, Ed Briggs, Ken Borgendale, and Rahul Gupta. Mqtt version 5.0. https://docs.oasis-open.org/mqtt/mqtt/v5.0/mqtt-v5.0.html, 2019. OASIS Standard. F´atima Fern´andez, Mihail Zverev, Pablo Garrido, Jos´e R. Ju´arez, Josu Bilbao, and Ram´on Ag¨uero. And quic meets iot: performance assessment of mqtt over quic. In 2020 16th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), pages 1–6, Oct 2020. Faheem Iqbal, Moneeb Gohar, Hani Alquhayz, Seok-Joo Koh, and Jin- Ghoo Choi. Performance evaluation of amqp over quic in the internetof- thing networks. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 35(4):1–9, 2023. Jana Iyengar and Martin Thomson. Rfc 9000: Quic: A udp-based multiplexed and secure transport. Omtermet Emgomeeromg Task Force, 2021. Raj Jain. The Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis: Techniques For Experimental Design, Measurement, Simulation, and Modeling. John Wiley & Sons, New York, United State of America, 09 1991. Amir Javadpour, Guojun Wang, and Samira Rezaei. Resource management in a peer to peer cloud network for iot. Wirel. Pers. Commun., 115(3):2471–2488, December 2020. William H Kruskal and W Allen Wallis. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American statistical Association, 47(260):583–621, 1952. Puneet Kumar and Behnam Dezfouli. Implementation and analysis of quic for mqtt. Computer Networks, 150:28–45, 2019. Elizabeth Liri, Prateek Kumar Singh, Abdulrahman BIN Rabiah, Koushik Kar, Kiran Makhijani, and KK Ramakrishnan. Robustness of iot application protocols to network impairments. In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN), pages 97–103. IEEE, 2018. Eduardo Magrani. A Internet of Things. FGV Editora, Rio de Janeiro, 2018. Text in Portuguese. Michael Scharf and Sebastian Kiesel. Nxg03-5: Head-of-line blocking in tcp and sctp: Analysis and measurements. In IEEE Globecom 2006, pages 1–5, Nov 2006. Victor Seoane, Carlos Garcia-Rubio, Florina Almenares, and Celeste Campo. Performance evaluation of coap and mqtt with security support for iot environments. Computer Networks, 197:108338, 2021. Wentao Shang, Yingdi Yu, Ralph Droms, and Lixia Zhang. Challenges in iot networking via tcp/ip architecture. Technical Report NDN-0038, NDN Project, February 2016. Emiliano Sisinni, Abusayeed Saifullah, Song Han, Ulf Jennehag, and Mikael Gidlund. Industrial internet of things: Challenges, opportunities, and directions. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 14(11):4724–4734, Nov 2018. Erik Sy, Christian Burkert, Hannes Federrath, and Mathias Fischer. A quic look at web tracking. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2019:255–266, 07 2019. M Thomson and S Turner. Rfc 9001: Using tls to secure quic, 2021. Emanuel Vieira, Murilo Cervi, Renato Azevedo, and Tiago Rizzetti. Performance and energy efficiency analysis of mqtt and coap protocols in the iot context. In Extended Proceedings of the XXIV Brazilian Symposium on Information and Computational Systems Security, pages 321–327, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 2024. SBC. Text in Portuguese. Mostafa Zaman, Nathan Puryear, Sherif Abdelwahed, and Nasibeh Zohrabi. A review of iot-based smart city development and management. Smart Cities, 7(3):1462–1501, 2024. Xumiao Zhang, Shuowei Jin, Yi He, Ahmad Hassan, Z Morley Mao, Feng Qian, and Zhi-Li Zhang. Quic is not quick enough over fast internet. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, pages 2713– 2722, 2024. | pt_BR |
| dc.rights | Acesso Aberto | pt_BR |
| dc.subject | QUIC ( Quick UDP Internet Connections ) | pt_BR |
| dc.subject | MQTT ( Message Queuing Telemetry Transport ) | pt_BR |
| dc.subject | TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) | pt_BR |
| dc.subject | IoT | pt_BR |
| dc.subject | Avaliação de desempenho | pt_BR |
| dc.subject | Internet das coisas | pt_BR |
| dc.title | MQTT Over QUIC: Comparison with TCP and TCP+TLS in a Virtualized IoT Environment | pt_BR |
| dc.type | Article | pt_BR |
| dc.identifier.doi | DOI: https://doi.org/10.23919/softcom66362.2025.11197418 | pt_BR |
| dc.creator.Lattes | http://lattes.cnpq.br/0991253084102273 | pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.advisor1 | Farias, Ramon Mota de Souza | |
| dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes | http://lattes.cnpq.br/2865254720853016 | pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.advisor-co1 | Cavalcanti, David Junio Mota | |
| dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes | http://lattes.cnpq.br/8585426872891843 | pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.referee1 | Farias, Ramon Mota de Souza | |
| dc.contributor.referee2 | Lima, Allan Diego Silva | |
| dc.contributor.referee3 | Queiroz, Anderson Apolônio Lira | |
| dc.contributor.referee1Lattes | http://lattes.cnpq.br/2865254720853016 | pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.referee2Lattes | http://lattes.cnpq.br/9459314439932852 | pt_BR |
| dc.contributor.referee3Lattes | http://lattes.cnpq.br/0652960425058437 | pt_BR |
| dc.publisher.department | Igarassu | pt_BR |
| dc.publisher.country | Brasil | pt_BR |
| dc.subject.cnpq | CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::CIENCIA DA COMPUTACAO::SISTEMAS DE COMPUTACAO | pt_BR |
| dc.description.resumo | Aplicações de IoT exigem comunicação confiável, eficiente e segura devido à sua natureza distribuída e com recursos limitados. O protocolo MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport) é amplamente adotado nesses ambientes por seu design leve, que requer recursos mínimos e otimiza a largura de banda da rede. No entanto, ele ainda enfrenta problemas de desempenho devido à sobrecarga do TCP e do TLS (Transport Layer Security). O protocolo QUIC (Quick UDP Internet Connections) surgiu como uma alternativa promissora para melhorar o desempenho da comunicação. Contudo, os estudos de desempenho existentes carecem de avaliações do MQTT sobre QUIC em condições de baixa latência e redes instáveis. Este artigo compara o desempenho do MQTT sobre QUIC, TCP e TCP+TLS em um ambiente virtualizado de IoT. A avaliação de desempenho segue uma abordagem bem estabelecida e analisa a latência e o tempo de estabelecimento da conexão como métricas-chave em condições estáveis e instáveis. Os resultados destacam o potencial do QUIC como uma alternativa eficiente e segura para comunicação em IoT. | pt_BR |

